Yep, we may get a tiny thank-you (read: commission) when you buy through links on Soundfindr — not enough for a yacht, but enough to keep the lights (and servers) on. Learn more
67 Highlights 43 Differences 5 Reactions 0 Likes
Sennheiser MKE 400 vs Rode VideoMic Pro: 67 Highlights & 43 Differences — So, Which Microphone Actually Works Better
MKE 400 is compact, portable, and ideal for mobile recording. Rode VideoMic Pro offers superior preamp quality and durability for pro creators. What sets Sennheiser MKE 400 and Rode VideoMic Pro apart in the music world? We looked at their width, connection interface, onboard controls & body material and key features in this microphones showdown.
Features Multi-Mode Switch Shows whether the microphone includes a switch to toggle between different recording modes or polar patterns. with a difference of 45 points
Clear Led Indicators Lights that show status such as mute, levels, or power. with a difference of 5 points
Sennheiser MKE 400 vs Rode VideoMic Pro: A Detailed Comparison Of Two On-Camera Shotgun Microphones
The Sennheiser MKE 400 and Rode VideoMic Pro are both highly regarded condenser microphones tailored for on-camera use, targeting users from beginners to professionals engaging in studio recording, live streaming, podcasting, and broadcasting.
While they share a supercardioid polar pattern and wired connectivity aimed at capturing directional audio clearly, they differ in design philosophy, power solutions, audio performance, and accessory bundles. The MKE 400 is a relatively newer offering from 2020, featuring a robust metal build, compatibility with PC, Mac, iOS, Android, and camera devices, and advanced features like low-latency headphone monitoring alongside adjustable sensitivity presets.
In contrast, the Rode VideoMic Pro, launched back in 2010, focuses on delivering excellent sound quality with a higher max SPL and superior dynamic range, professional broadcast certification, and firmware upgrade support, but with a lightweight plastic body and compatibility limited to cameras.
Building A Durable And Versatile Setup With The Sennheiser MKE 400
The Sennheiser MKE 400 stands out primarily due to its rugged, metal body construction that includes corrosion resistance, ensuring longevity and durability in varied field conditions. Its compact form factor weighs approximately 0.21 lbs and offers versatile mounting options, including stand, boom arm, clip, and shock mount compatibility with a 3/8" thread size. One of the distinguishing design features is the detachable TRS/TRRS cable, allowing for quick replacements or switching between devices, plus detachable mounts for convenient setup adjustments.
Connectivity-wise, the MKE 400 supports both analog and unbalanced outputs without phantom power requirement, and crucially supports external power supply compatibility, which expands usage flexibility. Operating on AAA batteries rated for up to 100 hours of battery life with an auto power-off feature, it excels in enduring long recording sessions. Additional utility comes from integrated low-latency headphone monitoring, which is invaluable for real-time sound checking; a feature that the Rode lacks.
In terms of audio performance, while the MKE 400's sensitivity sits at -42 dB (compared to Rode's -38 dB), it employs a low-cut filter at 200 Hz and a "voice isolation" feature for isolating spoken content effectively during field recording. Its internal preamp is rated studio-grade and transformerless, with a fast transient response catering to clear and natural sound capture. Users also benefit from a multi-mode switch and sensitivity preset profiles, enhancing adaptability across different environments.
The included accessories elevate its overall value: it arrives with a carrying case, multiple adapters, an extra windscreen, a mounting clip, and protective foam inserts; all packed securely in a box. Plus, it boasts safety and environmental compliance along with a 2-year warranty for peace of mind. This blend of durability, flexibility, and intelligent features makes the MKE 400 a wise choice for multimedia creators who need reliable gear with practical conveniences.
Why The Rode VideoMic Pro Remains A Go-To For Broadcast-Quality Sound
The Rode VideoMic Pro continues to be a favored microphone for professionals seeking broadcast-certified audio at a reasonable price point. Although it has been on the market since 2010, its well-thought-out design and sound characteristics remain relevant. The microphone features a lightweight plastic body with a matte finish, weighing just 0.18 lbs, and comes equipped with a pop filter and an internal shock mount that helps reduce handling noise.
A key strength lies in its impressive audio specs: it has a higher sensitivity (-38 dB), a max SPL of 134 dB, and a dynamic range of 120 dB, allowing it to capture louder sound sources without distortion while maintaining excellent clarity, complemented by a better signal-to-noise ratio of 74 dB. The low-cut filter is set at 80 Hz, slightly less aggressive than the MKE 400, allowing for more low-frequency content, which might be beneficial for specific recording needs.
Connectivity is via a fixed TRS cable (no detachable option), with analog unbalanced output and no support for an external power supply. The device runs on a 9V battery with approximately 70 hours of usage and lacks auto power-off, which might require more user vigilance regarding power management. However, it includes a tripod stand and mounting clip, although it does not come with a carrying case or extra windscreens.
In terms of usability, the Rode offers gain control and onboard buttons and switches, with an on/off switch and LED indicator lights for status. Still, it does not provide headphone monitoring or multi-mode switching. Where it truly edges out is through its professional broadcast certification and the capacity for firmware upgrades, allowing users to benefit from feature enhancements post-purchase, potentially a unique advantage for those invested in future-proofing their equipment.
The Rode VideoMic Pro also benefits from a 1-year warranty and environmental and safety approvals, ensuring compliance with international standards. This makes it particularly attractive for filmmakers, videographers, and broadcasters prioritizing sound fidelity and certification over some modern convenience features.
Quick Take
The Sennheiser MKE 400 shines with its sturdy metal construction, extended battery life, and smart real-time monitoring features, making it a highly flexible tool for creatives using a wide range of recording devices. Meanwhile, the Rode VideoMic Pro appeals most to those who demand high audio quality, professional certification, and the assurance of firmware updates, despite its older design and shorter battery endurance.
Bottom Line
If you value durability, modern user-centric features like low-latency headphone monitoring, and compatibility across multiple platforms, the Sennheiser MKE 400 is the better pick. Its longer battery life and versatile cabling options further enhance its appeal as a go-to for on-the-go content creators.
Conversely, suppose your priority is pristine broadcast-standard audio quality with a commendable dynamic range and signal-to-noise ratio, backed by professional broadcast certification and future firmware support. In that case, the Rode VideoMic Pro stands out as the preferred microphone, especially for cinematic and broadcasting professionals.
Verdict
Winner: Sennheiser MKE 400 - Offers a modern design with durable metal build, superior battery life, detachable cabling, multi-platform compatibility, and innovative monitoring features suited for diverse recording scenarios.
Runner-up: Rode VideoMic Pro - Delivers excellent audio fidelity with higher max SPL, better dynamic range, professional broadcast certification, and firmware upgrade capabilities, favored by users focused on sound quality and broadcast compliance.
For price reference, the Sennheiser MKE 400 typically retails around $219 at B&H Photo Video.
Side by side. The numbers. The features. No drama.
Is Sennheiser MKE 400 better than Rode VideoMic Pro? Depends on your playstyle. This deep microphones breakdown includes specs, feel, tone quality, and what musicians think.
The MKE 400 was released in 2020 and is made in Germany, while the VideoMic Pro dates back to 2010 with Australian origins. Newer German engineering in the MKE 400 offers more contemporary performance and design for modern creators.
The specific product identifier from the manufacturer.
In the battle of Model Name, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 6 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Model Name on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
The MKE 400 is crafted in Germany, known for precision audio gear, whereas the VideoMic Pro comes from Australia. This difference might influence slight variations in build quality and local support services.
Manufacturing or design origin.
In the battle of Country of Origin, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 38 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Country of Origin on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
75 Rode VideoMic Pro 0Votes Studio, Live, Podcast, Broadcast, Streaming
vs Intended Use
Both microphones suit studio, live, podcast, broadcast, and streaming uses, but the MKE 400 adds instrument and field recording compatibility, making it a more versatile choice for multifaceted creators.
Describes the primary application area.
In the battle of Intended Use, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is worse than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering lower 2 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Intended Use on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
80 Sennheiser MKE 400 0Votes PC, Mac, iOS, Android, Camera
35 Rode VideoMic Pro 0Votes Camera
vs Compatibility
The MKE 400 supports broader compatibility with PC, Mac, iOS, Android, and cameras, whereas the VideoMic Pro only explicitly supports cameras, limiting device connection options for the latter.
Lists supported platforms and devices.
In the battle of Compatibility, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 45 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Compatibility on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
55 Rode VideoMic Pro 0Votes Shock Mount, Shoe Mount
vs Mounting Type
Mounting options differ: the MKE 400 offers stand, boom arm, clip, and shock mount compatibility, giving flexible mounting setups, while the VideoMic Pro is limited to shock mount and shoe mount, restricting placement.
The typical mounting or support style.
In the battle of Mounting Type, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is worse than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering lower 1 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Mounting Type on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
While both cater to adults, the MKE 400 explicitly targets professional users alongside beginners and intermediates, suggesting it may offer features better suited for professional applications.
The intended user age bracket.
In the battle of Age Group, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 18 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Age Group on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Product Type
What is the product type?
58 Sennheiser MKE 400 0Votes Condenser
55 Rode VideoMic Pro 0Votes Condenser
Sennheiser MKE 400
This is a condenser microphone, which is ideal for capturing clear, accurate audio in both studio and live settings.
Rode VideoMic Pro
A condenser microphone provides high sensitivity, ideal for capturing detailed and accurate sound. It's perfect for environments where clarity and precision are important.
Defines the basic category of the microphone.
In the battle of Product Type, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 3 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Product Type on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Year of Release
What year was it released?
84 Sennheiser MKE 400 0Votes 2020
51 Rode VideoMic Pro 0Votes 2010
Sennheiser MKE 400
Released in 2020, it features modern audio technology and is suited for content creators, streamers, and audio professionals.
Rode VideoMic Pro
Released in 2010, this microphone has been a top choice for content creators. Its reliable performance has kept it relevant in the industry for over a decade.
Indicates when the microphone was launched.
In the battle of Year of Release, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 33 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Year of Release on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Form Factor
What is the form factor?
68 Sennheiser MKE 400 0Votes Shotgun
65 Rode VideoMic Pro 0Votes Shotgun
Sennheiser MKE 400
As a shotgun microphone, the MKE 400 excels at directional audio capture, making it ideal for recording focused sound while minimizing background noise.
Rode VideoMic Pro
As a shotgun mic, it captures sound directly from the front while rejecting noise from the sides and rear. This makes it perfect for filming in noisy environments.
Describes the physical style of the microphone.
In the battle of Form Factor, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 3 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Form Factor on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Polar Pattern Type
What is the polar pattern type?
73 Sennheiser MKE 400 0Votes Supercardioid
70 Rode VideoMic Pro 0Votes Supercardioid
Sennheiser MKE 400
The supercardioid pattern focuses on sound directly in front of the microphone, ideal for capturing voice or instruments from a specific direction.
Rode VideoMic Pro
The supercardioid polar pattern offers tight focus on your sound source while minimizing background noise. It’s the ideal choice for isolating audio in busy or unpredictable environments.
Identifies the default pickup pattern.
In the battle of Polar Pattern Type, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 3 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Polar Pattern Type on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Connectivity Type
What is the connectivity type?
38 Sennheiser MKE 400 0Votes Wired
35 Rode VideoMic Pro 0Votes Wired
Sennheiser MKE 400
Wired connection ensures consistent and reliable audio performance, without worrying about battery or signal interference issues common with wireless setups.
Rode VideoMic Pro
Wired connection provides a stable, uninterrupted signal, ensuring your audio remains clear and consistent. This is essential for professional recordings where reliability is key.
Defines how the microphone connects to devices.
In the battle of Connectivity Type, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 3 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Connectivity Type on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Color Options
What are the color options?
38 Sennheiser MKE 400 0Votes Black
35 Rode VideoMic Pro 0Votes Black
Sennheiser MKE 400
A standard black color, providing a professional and unobtrusive appearance for use in various recording environments.
Rode VideoMic Pro
The sleek black design ensures the VideoMic Pro blends seamlessly with your camera gear. It’s a classic look that’s versatile for any filming setup.
Available product colors.
In the battle of Color Options, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 3 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Color Options on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Gender Target
What is the gender target?
48 Sennheiser MKE 400 0Votes Unisex
45 Rode VideoMic Pro 0Votes Unisex
Sennheiser MKE 400
Suitable for all users, regardless of gender, making it a versatile choice for a wide audience.
Rode VideoMic Pro
Designed for all users, the VideoMic Pro is versatile and user-friendly for everyone. It’s built to meet the needs of any content creator, regardless of gender.
The marketing target by gender (if specified).
In the battle of Gender Target, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 3 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Gender Target on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
67 Rode VideoMic Pro 0Votes Studio, Live, Podcast, Broadcast, Streaming
Sennheiser MKE 400
Perfect for a range of professional audio tasks, from studio recording to field interviews, and podcasting.
Rode VideoMic Pro
The VideoMic Pro shines in any recording environment, whether you’re capturing content for podcasts, live events, or professional broadcasts. It ensures crystal-clear sound in every situation.
Specific contexts where the mic is best suited.
In the battle of Recording Application Category, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 1 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Recording Application Category on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
User Skill Level
What is the user skill level?
48 Sennheiser MKE 400 0Votes Beginner, Intermediate, Professional
45 Rode VideoMic Pro 0Votes Beginner, Intermediate, Professional
Sennheiser MKE 400
Whether you're a beginner, intermediate, or professional, the MKE 400 offers high-quality performance at all skill levels.
Rode VideoMic Pro
Whether you’re just starting out or you’re a seasoned professional, the VideoMic Pro offers features that grow with you. It’s easy to use for beginners, yet delivers the quality professionals demand.
Recommended audience expertise level.
In the battle of User Skill Level, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 3 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the User Skill Level on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Launch Region
Where is it available?
98 Sennheiser MKE 400 0Votes Global
95 Rode VideoMic Pro 0Votes Global
Sennheiser MKE 400
Available globally, this microphone can be easily accessed by audio professionals worldwide.
Rode VideoMic Pro
The VideoMic Pro is available worldwide, ensuring content creators everywhere can benefit from its quality. Its global availability makes it a top choice for international productions.
Where the product is primarily available.
In the battle of Launch Region, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 3 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Launch Region on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Limited Edition
Is it a limited/special edition?
No 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400
No 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro
Sennheiser MKE 400
Not a limited edition model, available year-round for purchase.
Rode VideoMic Pro
This model is not limited edition, ensuring consistent availability. You can rely on its steady production, so you won’t have trouble replacing or upgrading.
Whether the model is a limited or special release.
In the battle of Limited Edition, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is same as Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Limited Edition on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Series/Line
What series/line does it belong to?
Who knows? 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Identifies the product line or collection the microphone belongs to.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Series/Line on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
The MKE 400 is 2.64 inches wide versus 3.93 inches for the VideoMic Pro, making it more compact and easier to handle or mount in tight spaces for stealthier recording setups.
The microphone’s overall width.
In the battle of Width, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is worse than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 1.9 inch measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Width on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
With a depth of 4.96 inches compared to the VideoMic Pro's 6.69 inches, the MKE 400 offers a shorter profile, beneficial for setups needing minimized microphone footprint.
The microphone’s overall depth.
In the battle of Depth, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is worse than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 3.4 inch measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Depth on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
The MKE 400's height is only 1.46 inches, less than half the VideoMic Pro's 2.95 inches, contributing to its sleek, portable design that is less intrusive on camera rigs.
The microphone’s overall height.
In the battle of Height, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering lower 5.2 inch measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Height on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Weighing 0.21 lbs (95 grams), the MKE 400 is slightly heavier than the VideoMic Pro at 0.18 lbs (82 grams), though both remain lightweight for easy handheld or mounted use during extended shoots.
The microphone’s physical weight.
In the battle of Weight, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is worse than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering equal 0.21 lbs measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Weight on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows? 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
0.5 inch 0Votes
vs Capsule Diameter
The VideoMic Pro specifies a capsule diameter of 0.5 inch, while the MKE 400 capsule size is unspecified, possibly indicating a design that could affect sound capture characteristics.
The diameter of the microphone capsule.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Capsule Diameter on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Package Width
What is the package width?
Who knows? 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
8.5 inch 0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro
The package width of 8.5 inches (21.6 cm) ensures the mic is well-protected during shipping. It also allows for easy storage and organization once opened.
The shipping package’s width.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Package Width on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Package Depth
What is the package depth?
Who knows? 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
5.6 inch 0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro
Measuring 5.6 inches (14.2 cm) deep, the packaging provides ample room for the mic and accessories. It’s the perfect size for keeping everything neatly packed.
The shipping package’s depth.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Package Depth on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Package Height
What is the package height?
Who knows? 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
3.1 inch 0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro
The package height of 3.1 inches (7.9 cm) makes it easy to store and transport the mic. It’s compact and efficient for both storage and shipping.
The shipping package’s height.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Package Height on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Cable Length
What is the cable length?
Who knows? 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Length of the included or integrated cable.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Cable Length on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Stand/Arm Length
What is the stand/arm length?
Who knows? 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Maximum length of included stand or boom arm.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Stand/Arm Length on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Capsule Length
What is the capsule length?
Who knows? 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro (Help us out by suggesting one!)
The length of the microphone capsule.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Capsule Length on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Grill Diameter
What is the grill diameter?
Who knows? 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro (Help us out by suggesting one!)
The diameter of the protective microphone grill.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Grill Diameter on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Mounting Thread Size
What is the mounting thread size?
65 Sennheiser MKE 400 0Votes 3/8"
Who knows? 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro (Help us out by suggesting one!)
The thread size for mounting compatibility.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Mounting Thread Size on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Base Footprint Diameter
What is the base/stand footprint diameter?
Who knows? 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Diameter of the microphone base or stand footprint.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Base Footprint Diameter on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Frequency response starts at 50 Hz for the MKE 400 and 40 Hz for the VideoMic Pro, meaning the VideoMic Pro captures slightly lower bass tones, suitable for richer low-end audio recording.
The lowest frequency the mic can capture.
In the battle of Frequency Response (Min), Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is worse than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 10.0 Hz measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Frequency Response (Min) on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
The MKE 400 has a sensitivity of -42 dBV/Pa, which is lower than the VideoMic Pro's -38 dBV/Pa, implying the VideoMic Pro captures quieter sounds more effectively but may pick up more background noise.
Output level relative to sound pressure.
In the battle of Sensitivity, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is worse than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering lower 4.0 dBV/Pa measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Sensitivity on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows? 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
74 dB 0Votes
vs Signal-to-Noise Ratio
VideoMic Pro boasts a strong 74 dB signal-to-noise ratio, while the MKE 400's is unspecified, suggesting the VideoMic Pro likely delivers cleaner sound with less background hiss.
The clarity ratio between signal and background noise.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Signal-to-Noise Ratio on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows? 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
120 dB 0Votes
vs Dynamic Range
The VideoMic Pro has a 120 dB dynamic range compared to no data for the MKE 400, indicating better ability to handle loud to quiet sounds without distortion.
The range between quietest and loudest sounds captured.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Dynamic Range on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Both microphones have high max SPL, with the VideoMic Pro slightly higher at 134 dB compared to 132 dB for the MKE 400, allowing them to handle loud audio sources but with a slight edge to the VideoMic Pro.
The maximum loudness before distortion.
In the battle of Max SPL, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is worse than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering lower 2.0 dB measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Max SPL on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
The Equivalent Noise Level sits at 21 dB for the MKE 400 and slightly better 20 dB for the VideoMic Pro, the difference is minimal but reflects marginally quieter baseline noise on the VideoMic Pro.
The self-noise generated by the microphone.
In the battle of Equivalent Noise Level, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is worse than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 1.0 dB measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Equivalent Noise Level on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows? 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
15 Rode VideoMic Pro 0Votes Unidirectional
vs Directionality
The MKE 400's directionality is not specified, while the VideoMic Pro is unidirectional, meaning the latter is better at isolating the sound source in noisy environments.
General pickup orientation.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Directionality on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows? 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
200 ohm 0Votes
vs Output Impedance
The VideoMic Pro has a low output impedance of 200 ohms, ideal for long cable runs without signal loss. The MKE 400 specifies a minimum terminating impedance of 1000 ohms, which may affect compatibility with certain audio interfaces.
Electrical resistance of the microphone’s output.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Output Impedance on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Pre-attenuation pad differs: MKE 400 offers -20 dB pad, double the -10 dB pad on the VideoMic Pro, enabling better handling of extremely loud sources without distortion.
Built-in reduction for handling loud signals.
In the battle of Pre-Attenuation Pad, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is worse than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering lower 10.0 dB measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Pre-Attenuation Pad on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Low-cut filter starts at 200 Hz on MKE 400 versus 80 Hz on VideoMic Pro, making the latter better at preserving lower-frequency sounds while the former aggressively reduces low-end noise and rumble.
Removes low-end rumble.
In the battle of Low-Cut Filter, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 120.0 Hz measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Low-Cut Filter on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
The MKE 400 includes a voice isolation feature to focus on speech clarity, which is absent from the VideoMic Pro, making the MKE 400 more tailored for vocal-focused recordings.
Whether the mic includes isolation tech.
In the battle of Voice Isolation Feature, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 45 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Voice Isolation Feature on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
The MKE 400 sports a studio-grade internal preamp delivering cleaner, high-quality amplification compared to the VideoMic Pro's basic preamp, enhancing sound fidelity for professional content creators.
Describes the built-in preamp’s fidelity.
In the battle of Internal Preamp Quality, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 73 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Internal Preamp Quality on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Microphone Type
What is the microphone type?
68 Sennheiser MKE 400 0Votes Condenser
65 Rode VideoMic Pro 0Votes Condenser
Rode VideoMic Pro
The VideoMic Pro uses a condenser microphone type, offering high sensitivity and capturing even the smallest details in your recordings.
Defines the operating principle of the microphone.
In the battle of Microphone Type, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 3 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Microphone Type on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Frequency Response (Max)
What is the maximum frequency response?
20,000 Hz 0Votes
20,000 Hz 0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro
With a frequency range up to 20,000 Hz, the VideoMic Pro ensures full-range audio, capturing high-frequency details that many other mics miss.
The highest frequency the mic can capture.
In the battle of Frequency Response (Max), Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is same as Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering equal 20,000.00 Hz measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Frequency Response (Max) on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Gain Range
What is the gain range?
20 dB 0Votes
20 dB 0Votes
Rode VideoMic Pro
With a gain range of 20 dB, the mic adapts to different sound levels, making it versatile for various recording situations.
The adjustable gain span.
In the battle of Gain Range, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is same as Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering equal 20.00 dB measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Gain Range on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Stereo/Mono Mode
What mode is supported?
28 Sennheiser MKE 400 0Votes Mono
25 Rode VideoMic Pro 0Votes Mono
Rode VideoMic Pro
The mic is set to mono, which is ideal for single-source recording like interviews or podcasts. It provides clear, direct sound.
Determines recording mode.
In the battle of Stereo/Mono Mode, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 3 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Stereo/Mono Mode on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Proximity Effect Control
Does it have proximity effect control?
No 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400
No 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro
Rode VideoMic Pro
No proximity effect control, but the mic’s supercardioid pattern helps focus on the desired sound source.
Whether it has control for bass buildup at close range.
In the battle of Proximity Effect Control, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is same as Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Proximity Effect Control on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Transformer/Transformerless Design
What design does it use?
98 Sennheiser MKE 400 0Votes Transformerless
95 Rode VideoMic Pro 0Votes Transformerless
Rode VideoMic Pro
The transformerless design minimizes electromagnetic interference, ensuring clean, uncolored audio.
The electrical coupling approach used.
In the battle of Transformer/Transformerless Design, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 3 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Transformer/Transformerless Design on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Capsule Type
What is the capsule type?
73 Sennheiser MKE 400 0Votes Small Diaphragm
Who knows? 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Specifies the capsule style that influences sound capture.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Capsule Type on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Minimum Terminating Impedance
What is the minimum terminating impedance?
1,000 Ω 0Votes
Who knows? 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro (Help us out by suggesting one!)
The minimum load impedance required for optimal microphone performance and to avoid signal distortion.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Minimum Terminating Impedance on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
THD
What is the THD (total Harmonic Distortion)?
Who knows? 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Distortion added at high volumes.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the THD on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Acoustic Principle
What is the acoustic principle?
78 Sennheiser MKE 400 0Votes Pressure Gradient
Who knows? 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro (Help us out by suggesting one!)
The underlying sound capture mechanism.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Acoustic Principle on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Headroom
What is the headroom?
Who knows? 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Range above nominal operating level before distortion.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Headroom on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Transient Response
What is the transient response?
98 Sennheiser MKE 400 0Votes Fast
Who knows? 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Ability to capture sudden sound changes.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Transient Response on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Off-Axis Rejection
What is the off-axis rejection?
Who knows? 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Sensitivity drop when sound comes from the side/rear.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Off-Axis Rejection on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Overload Point
What is the overload point?
Who knows? 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro (Help us out by suggesting one!)
The SPL level where overload occurs.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Overload Point on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Acoustic Noise Isolation Rating
What is the acoustic noise isolation rating?
Who knows? 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Rating for rejecting ambient noise.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Acoustic Noise Isolation Rating on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Polar Pattern Switching Precision
What is the switching precision?
Who knows? 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro (Help us out by suggesting one!)
The accuracy of selectable polar patterns.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Polar Pattern Switching Precision on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Output Level
What is the output level?
Who knows? 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro (Help us out by suggesting one!)
The output voltage relative to input pressure.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Output Level on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Connection interface differences: MKE 400 supports TRS and TRRS connectors, broadening compatibility with varied devices, while the VideoMic Pro only uses TRS, limiting flexibility with mobile devices.
Defines the main interface for connectivity.
In the battle of Connection Interface, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 8 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Connection Interface on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
The MKE 400 has a detachable cable, convenient for replacement and portability, whereas the VideoMic Pro's cable is fixed, which may reduce ease of transport and maintenance.
Whether the cable can be detached or replaced.
In the battle of Cable Detachable, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 45 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Cable Detachable on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Neither microphone supports dual output capability, so users cannot simultaneously send audio to multiple devices, which is a limitation for complex recording rigs.
Ability to provide two simultaneous outputs.
In the battle of Dual Output Capability, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is same as Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Dual Output Capability on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Both mics feature shielding against RF interference, ensuring stable audio signals without radio frequency noise during recordings in urban or electronically dense environments.
Indicates built-in protection against RF interference.
In the battle of Shielding Against RF Interference, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Shielding Against RF Interference on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Wireless Technology
What wireless technology is used?
Who knows? 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro (Help us out by suggesting one!)
The wireless system type used.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Wireless Technology on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Bluetooth Version
What Bluetooth version does it support?
Who knows? 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Version of Bluetooth supported (if applicable).
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Bluetooth Version on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
RF Frequency Range
What is the RF frequency range?
Who knows? 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Frequency spectrum range for mics.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the RF Frequency Range on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
USB Compatibility
What USB versions are compatible?
Who knows? 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Identifies supported USB standards.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the USB Compatibility on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Audio Output Options
What are the audio output options?
13 Sennheiser MKE 400 0Votes Analog, Unbalanced
10 Rode VideoMic Pro 0Votes Analog, Unbalanced
Lists output signal formats available.
In the battle of Audio Output Options, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 3 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Audio Output Options on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Phantom Power Support
Does it support phantom power?
No 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400
No 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro
Whether the mic supports phantom power.
In the battle of Phantom Power Support, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is same as Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Phantom Power Support on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Interface Latency
What is the interface latency?
Who knows? 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Latency introduced by the interface.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Interface Latency on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Multi-Device Pairing
Does it support multi-device pairing?
Who knows? 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Ability to connect to multiple devices simultaneously.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Multi-Device Pairing on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Balanced/Unbalanced Output
What is the output type?
48 Sennheiser MKE 400 0Votes Unbalanced
45 Rode VideoMic Pro 0Votes Unbalanced
Defines the type of electrical signal output.
In the battle of Balanced/Unbalanced Output, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 3 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Balanced/Unbalanced Output on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
XLR Pin Configuration
What is the XLR pin configuration?
Who knows? 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
95 Rode VideoMic Pro 0Votes Standard
Specifies XLR wiring configuration.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the XLR Pin Configuration on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Ground Lift Switch
Does it have a ground lift switch?
No 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400
No 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro
Prevents ground loop hum in audio systems.
In the battle of Ground Lift Switch, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is same as Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Ground Lift Switch on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Battery life favours the MKE 400 with 100 hours of use versus 70 hours for the VideoMic Pro, providing longer recording sessions before needing battery replacement.
How long the microphone operates per charge.
In the battle of Battery Life, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 30.0 hrs measurement.
Based on community votes for Battery Life, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ earned 1 votes, more than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉, which got 0 votes.
Battery types differ significantly: MKE 400 uses AAA batteries, easy to find and lightweight, while the VideoMic Pro operates on a 9V battery, which offers higher voltage but bulkier size, affecting battery life and weight.
The type of battery used if portable.
In the battle of Battery Type, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 11 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Battery Type on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows? 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
0.04 Watt 0Votes
vs Power Consumption
The VideoMic Pro's power consumption is stated as 0.04 watts, indicating very low power draw, while the MKE 400’s power consumption is unspecified.
Amount of power drawn during use.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Power Consumption on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
MKE 400 supports auto power-off to conserve battery when inactive, a feature missing from the VideoMic Pro, enhancing battery efficiency for the MKE 400.
Whether the microphone shuts down automatically when idle.
In the battle of Auto Power-Off, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 45 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Auto Power-Off on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Both microphones support replaceable batteries, allowing quick swaps for continuous operation, which is essential for field and extended shoots.
Indicates if batteries can be swapped.
In the battle of Replaceable Battery Support, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Replaceable Battery Support on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
The MKE 400 supports external power supply compatibility for flexible power options, unlike the VideoMic Pro which lacks this feature, giving MKE 400 an advantage for stationary studio setups.
Can the mic run on external AC/DC supply.
In the battle of External Power Supply Compatibility, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 45 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the External Power Supply Compatibility on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Both include a power indicator light, helping users confirm operational status, enhancing ease of use during recording.
Whether a light shows power/battery status.
In the battle of Power Indicator Light, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Power Indicator Light on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Power Source
What is the power source?
38 Sennheiser MKE 400 0Votes Battery
35 Rode VideoMic Pro 0Votes Battery
Rode VideoMic Pro
The VideoMic Pro runs on a single 9V battery that provides long operating life, making it reliable for extended shoots. Its internal circuitry is designed to remain quiet and stable even as the battery drains, ensuring consistent audio performance throughout use.
Defines how the microphone is powered.
In the battle of Power Source, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 3 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Power Source on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Phantom Power Requirement
What is the phantom power requirement?
Who knows? 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Specifies the phantom power voltage needed.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Phantom Power Requirement on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Capacity
What is the battery capacity?
1,050 mAh 0Votes
Who knows? 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Storage capacity of the built-in battery.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Battery Capacity on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Recharge Time
What is the recharge time?
Who knows? 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Time required to fully recharge the battery.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Recharge Time on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Method
What is the charging method?
Who knows? 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro (Help us out by suggesting one!)
The interface used for recharging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Charging Method on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
MKE 400 features headphone monitoring for real-time audio check, a professional tool absent in the VideoMic Pro, improving recording accuracy for live monitoring.
Direct monitoring via headphone output.
In the battle of Headphone Monitoring, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 45 score measurement.
Based on community votes for Headphone Monitoring, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ earned 1 votes, more than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉, which got 0 votes.
56 Rode VideoMic Pro 0Votes Buttons, Knobs, Switches
vs Onboard Controls
Onboard controls differ: MKE 400 has buttons and switches, offering straightforward use, while the VideoMic Pro adds knobs for finer control, appealing to users wanting manual adjustment precision.
Types of direct physical controls.
In the battle of Onboard Controls, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 6 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Onboard Controls on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
The MKE 400 includes a multi-mode switch, enhancing its adaptability for varying recording scenarios, whereas the VideoMic Pro lacks this, making setups less versatile.
Shows whether the microphone includes a switch to toggle between different recording modes or polar patterns.
In the battle of Multi-Mode Switch, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 45 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Multi-Mode Switch on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Sensitivity preset profiles present on the MKE 400 allow quick adjustments to different environments, absent on the VideoMic Pro, facilitating easier professional use.
Predefined sensitivity levels for various uses.
In the battle of Sensitivity Preset Profiles, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 45 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Sensitivity Preset Profiles on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
On/Off Switch
Does it include an on/off switch?
Yes 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400
Yes 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro
Whether the microphone includes a physical on/off switch.
In the battle of On/Off Switch, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the On/Off Switch on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Mute Function
Does it have a mute function?
No 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400
No 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro
Ability to mute audio directly on the mic.
In the battle of Mute Function, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is same as Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Mute Function on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Gain Control
Does it have gain control?
Yes 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400
Yes 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro
Ability to adjust input gain directly.
In the battle of Gain Control, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Gain Control on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Monitoring Mix Control
Does it have monitoring mix control?
No 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400
No 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro
Lets user adjust mic vs playback audio mix.
In the battle of Monitoring Mix Control, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is same as Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Monitoring Mix Control on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Touch/Motion Controls
Does it support touch/motion controls?
No 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400
No 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro
Allows interaction via touch gestures or motion.
In the battle of Touch/Motion Controls, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is same as Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Touch/Motion Controls on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
LED Indicator Lights
Does it have LED indicators?
Yes 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400
Yes 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro
Lights that show status such as mute, levels, or power.
In the battle of LED Indicator Lights, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the LED Indicator Lights on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
App/Software Integration
Is it integrated with software/apps?
No 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400
No 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro
Works with companion apps or software.
In the battle of App/Software Integration, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is same as Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the App/Software Integration on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
EQ Presets
Does it have EQ presets?
No 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400
No 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro
Pre-configured equalization modes.
In the battle of EQ Presets, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is same as Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the EQ Presets on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Voice Effects
Does it include voice effects?
No 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400
No 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro
Built-in voice modulation effects.
In the battle of Voice Effects, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is same as Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Voice Effects on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Feedback Suppression
Does it have feedback suppression?
No 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400
No 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro
Prevents audio feedback loops in live use.
In the battle of Feedback Suppression, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is same as Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Feedback Suppression on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Automatic Gain Adjustment
Does it support automatic gain adjustment?
No 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400
No 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro
Auto-adjusts mic gain for consistent output.
In the battle of Automatic Gain Adjustment, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is same as Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Automatic Gain Adjustment on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
One-touch Recording Button
Does it have a one-touch recording button?
No 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400
No 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro
A single button to start recording instantly.
In the battle of One-touch Recording Button, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is same as Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the One-touch Recording Button on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Lock Mode
Does it have a lock mode?
No 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400
No 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro
Prevents accidental control changes.
In the battle of Lock Mode, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is same as Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Lock Mode on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Programmable Button Functions
Can buttons be programmed?
No 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400
No 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro
Allows customizing buttons to user preference.
In the battle of Programmable Button Functions, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is same as Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Programmable Button Functions on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
MKE 400 features a metal body offering superior durability and professional feel, while the VideoMic Pro is built with plastic, which is lighter but less robust, impacting long-term resilience.
The main structural material of the microphone body.
In the battle of Body Material, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 33 score measurement.
Based on community votes for Body Material, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ earned 1 votes, more than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉, which got 0 votes.
Both models provide an internal shock mount, essential for reducing handling noise, though the MKE 400 includes an additional detachable mount, increasing mounting flexibility.
Whether a shock mount is included to reduce vibrations.
In the battle of Shock Mount, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Shock Mount on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
The VideoMic Pro includes a pop filter, helping reduce plosive sounds during vocal recording, a feature missing from the MKE 400 which might require external accessories for similar results.
Whether a pop filter is provided for plosive reduction.
In the battle of Pop Filter, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is worse than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Pop Filter on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
The detachable mount on the MKE 400 improves portability and ease of replacement, unlike the VideoMic Pro’s fixed mount, making it less flexible for rig setups.
If the mount can be detached for flexibility.
In the battle of Detachable Mount, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 45 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Detachable Mount on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
MKE 400 uses foam for internal dampening which typically offers balanced sound absorption, whereas the VideoMic Pro relies on a rubberized material that may affect sound isolation and physical durability.
The material used internally to reduce noise/vibration.
In the battle of Internal Dampening Material, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is worse than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering lower 7 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Internal Dampening Material on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Corrosion resistance is ensured in the MKE 400, adding to its longevity especially in humid or challenging environments, a feature not provided by the VideoMic Pro.
Indicates if materials resist corrosion.
In the battle of Corrosion Resistance, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 45 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Corrosion Resistance on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Finish/Coating
What finish/coating does it have?
78 Sennheiser MKE 400 0Votes Matte
75 Rode VideoMic Pro 0Votes Matte
Exterior treatment or surface finish.
In the battle of Finish/Coating, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 3 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Finish/Coating on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Water Resistance
Is it water resistant?
No 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400
No 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro
Indicates if the mic is resistant to water.
In the battle of Water Resistance, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is same as Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Water Resistance on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Dust Resistance
Is it dust resistant?
No 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400
No 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro
Indicates if the mic is resistant to dust.
In the battle of Dust Resistance, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is same as Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Dust Resistance on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Drop Resistance
Is it drop resistant?
No 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400
No 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro
Indicates if the mic is designed to survive accidental drops.
In the battle of Drop Resistance, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is same as Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Drop Resistance on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Adjustable Arm/Stand
Does it have an adjustable arm/stand?
No 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400
No 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro
Whether the arm/stand can be adjusted.
In the battle of Adjustable Arm/Stand, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is same as Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Adjustable Arm/Stand on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Swivel/Pivot Capability
Does it have swivel/pivot capability?
No 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400
No 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro
Whether the microphone head or stand can rotate.
In the battle of Swivel/Pivot Capability, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is same as Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Swivel/Pivot Capability on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Foldable Design
Is it foldable?
No 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400
No 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro
Indicates if the mic or its stand can fold for portability.
In the battle of Foldable Design, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is same as Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Foldable Design on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Grill Material
What is the grill material?
48 Sennheiser MKE 400 0Votes Metal
45 Rode VideoMic Pro 0Votes Metal
The material of the protective mic grill.
In the battle of Grill Material, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 3 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Grill Material on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Heat Resistance Rating
What is the heat resistance rating?
Who knows? 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Maximum heat level the mic can withstand.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Heat Resistance Rating on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Neodymium Magnet
Does it use a neodymium magnet?
No 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400
No 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro
States whether the capsule uses a neodymium magnet for stability.
In the battle of Neodymium Magnet, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is same as Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Neodymium Magnet on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Internal Shockmount
Is there an internal shockmount for the capsule?
Yes 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400
Yes 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro
Capsule isolation that reduces handling noise.
In the battle of Internal Shockmount, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Internal Shockmount on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
VideoMic Pro includes a stand/tripod, providing an all-in-one package for shooting, while the MKE 400 does not, requiring users to purchase mounting accessories separately.
Whether a stand or tripod is included in the box.
In the battle of Stand/Tripod, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is worse than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Stand/Tripod on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Adapters are included with the MKE 400 for versatile connectivity, whereas the VideoMic Pro lacks adapters, limiting its connection options out of the box.
States if adapter(s) are included (e.g., XLR to 3.5mm).
In the battle of Adapters, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 45 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Adapters on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
An extra windscreen is provided with the MKE 400, useful for replacements or different wind conditions, absent in the VideoMic Pro package.
Indicates if a spare windscreen is included.
In the battle of Extra Windscreen, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 45 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Extra Windscreen on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Both microphones have spare parts availability, important for long-term maintenance and repairs, ensuring continued usability.
Whether the manufacturer provides replacement parts.
In the battle of Spare Parts Availability, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Spare Parts Availability on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Protective foam insert is included in both packages to safeguard the microphone during shipping and storage, reflecting attention to product safety.
Indicates if protective foam is part of packaging.
In the battle of Protective Foam Insert, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Protective Foam Insert on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Cables
Are cables included?
Yes 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400
Yes 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro
Indicates if connecting cables are provided.
In the battle of Cables, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Cables on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Instruction Manual
Is an instruction manual included?
Yes 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400
Yes 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro
Whether a manual or quick-start guide is included.
In the battle of Instruction Manual, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Instruction Manual on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Packaging Type
What is the packaging type?
28 Sennheiser MKE 400 0Votes Box
25 Rode VideoMic Pro 0Votes Box
Defines how the product is packaged.
In the battle of Packaging Type, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 3 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Packaging Type on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Stickers/Branding
Are stickers/branding included?
No 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400
No 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro
Indicates if stickers or branded items are in the package.
In the battle of Stickers/Branding, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is same as Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Stickers/Branding on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Optional Windshield Model
What is the recommended windshield model?
49 Sennheiser MKE 400 0Votes MZH400
Who knows? 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Manufacturer-recommended windshield model.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Optional Windshield Model on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
VideoMic Pro holds professional broadcast certification, signaling suitability for high-standard production environments; the MKE 400 lacks this certification, which might influence broadcast professionals' choice.
Indicates if the mic meets pro broadcast standards.
In the battle of Professional Broadcast Certification, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is worse than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Professional Broadcast Certification on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Safety Compliance
Is it safety compliant?
Yes 1Votes Sennheiser MKE 400
Yes 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro
Indicates adherence to safety regulations.
In the battle of Safety Compliance, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 5 score measurement.
Based on community votes for Safety Compliance, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ earned 1 votes, more than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉, which got 0 votes.
Both mics meet safety standards, so you can trust either for your setup's compliance.
See more
Warranty
What is the warranty period?
2 years 0Votes
1 years 0Votes
Duration of manufacturer warranty coverage.
In the battle of Warranty, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 1.0 years measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Warranty on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Environmental Compliance
Is it environmentally compliant?
Yes 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400
Yes 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro
Compliance with eco/environmental regulations.
In the battle of Environmental Compliance, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Environmental Compliance on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
FCC/CE Approval
Is it FCC/CE approved?
Yes 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400
Yes 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro
Explicit FCC/CE compliance approval.
In the battle of FCC/CE Approval, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the FCC/CE Approval on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
RoHS Compliance
Is it RoHS compliant?
Yes 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400
Yes 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro
Restriction of Hazardous Substances directive compliance.
In the battle of RoHS Compliance, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 5 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the RoHS Compliance on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Temperature Range (Operating)
What is the operating temperature range?
58 Sennheiser MKE 400 0Votes 14° to 131°F
Who knows? 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Operating temperature window for reliable use.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Temperature Range (Operating) on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Firmware upgrade support is available on the VideoMic Pro, allowing performance improvements over time, while the MKE 400 does not support firmware updates.
Ability to update functionality via firmware.
In the battle of Firmware Upgrade Support, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is worse than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ .
Based on community votes for Firmware Upgrade Support, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ earned 0 votes, less than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉, which got 1 votes.
The MKE 400 supports low latency monitoring, enabling real-time audio listening with minimal delay, an essential feature missing in the VideoMic Pro, favoring live recording workflows.
Provides near real-time monitoring with minimal delay.
In the battle of Low Latency Monitoring, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is better than Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ , delivering higher 45 score measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Low Latency Monitoring on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Multi-Pattern Switching
Does it support multi-pattern switching?
No 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400
No 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro
Ability to switch between multiple pickup patterns.
In the battle of Multi-Pattern Switching, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is same as Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Multi-Pattern Switching on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
DSP Processing
Does it include DSP processing?
No 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400
No 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro
Built-in digital signal processing for sound shaping.
In the battle of DSP Processing, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is same as Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the DSP Processing on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
AI Noise Cancellation
Does it feature AI noise cancellation?
No 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400
No 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro
AI-powered suppression of background noise.
In the battle of AI Noise Cancellation, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is same as Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the AI Noise Cancellation on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Beamforming Technology
Does it support beamforming?
No 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400
No 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro
Uses mic arrays to focus on sound sources.
In the battle of Beamforming Technology, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is same as Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Beamforming Technology on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Voice Tracking
Does it include voice tracking?
No 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400
No 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro
Automatically follows speaker’s voice.
In the battle of Voice Tracking, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is same as Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Voice Tracking on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Recording Profiles
Does it have recording profiles?
No 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400
No 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro
Predefined sound settings for specific uses.
In the battle of Recording Profiles, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is same as Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Recording Profiles on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Surround Capture Mode
Does it support surround capture?
No 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400
No 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro
Ability to capture immersive 360° or surround sound.
In the battle of Surround Capture Mode, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is same as Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Surround Capture Mode on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Calibration
Does it support auto calibration?
No 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400
No 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro
Automatically adjusts mic response to environment.
In the battle of Auto Calibration, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is same as Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Auto Calibration on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Smart Assistant Compatibility
Is it compatible with smart assistants?
Who knows? 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400 (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows? 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro (Help us out by suggesting one!)
Integration with voice assistants.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Smart Assistant Compatibility on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Cloud Profile Storage
Does it support cloud profile storage?
No 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400
No 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro
Saves mic settings to the cloud.
In the battle of Cloud Profile Storage, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is same as Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Cloud Profile Storage on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Acoustic Modeling/Room Simulation
Does it feature acoustic modeling?
No 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400
No 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro
Simulates room acoustics or mic characteristics.
In the battle of Acoustic Modeling/Room Simulation, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is same as Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Acoustic Modeling/Room Simulation on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Dual Capsule Blending
Does it support dual capsule blending?
No 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400
No 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro
Blends outputs of dual capsules for tonal flexibility.
In the battle of Dual Capsule Blending, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is same as Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Dual Capsule Blending on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Hum-Compensating Coil
Does it have a hum-compensating coil?
No 0Votes Sennheiser MKE 400
No 0Votes Rode VideoMic Pro
Indicates if the mic includes a humbucking coil to reduce electrical interference.
In the battle of Hum-Compensating Coil, Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ is same as Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ .
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the Hum-Compensating Coil on Sennheiser MKE 400 ◉ vs Rode VideoMic Pro ◉ and help others decide!
Surveys
Because hot takes deserve votes.
Sound Quality
How would you rate the sound quality of this microphone?
Crisp and professional
0Votes
0Votes
Good and clear
0Votes
0Votes
Average clarity
0Votes
0Votes
Distorted and unclear
0Votes
0Votes
Noise Handling
How well does this microphone handle background noise?
Blocks out most noise
0Votes
0Votes
Handles noise fairly well
0Votes
0Votes
Reduces some noise
0Votes
0Votes
Picks up everything
0Votes
0Votes
Battery Life
How long does the battery last on this microphone?
Excellent — Over 20 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Long lasting — 10 to 20 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Decent — 5 to 10 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Short — 2 to 5 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Very short — Under 2 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Durability
How durable is this microphone based on build and lifespan?
Highly durable — Over 4 years
0Votes
0Votes
Solid — 2 to 4 years
0Votes
0Votes
Average — 1 to 2 years
0Votes
0Votes
Very fragile — Less than 1 year
0Votes
0Votes
Weight
How heavy is this microphone?
Ultra-light — Under 150 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Lightweight — 150 to 300 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Medium — 300 to 500 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Heavy — 500 to 800 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Very heavy — Over 800 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Design Appeal
How attractive is the design of this microphone?
Plain and boring
0Votes
0Votes
Somewhat okay
0Votes
0Votes
Nice looking
0Votes
0Votes
Stylish and modern
0Votes
0Votes
Pricing
How do you feel about the price of this microphone?
Great value for money
0Votes
0Votes
Pretty good price
0Votes
0Votes
Fair deal
0Votes
0Votes
Kinda pricey
0Votes
0Votes
Crazy expensive
0Votes
0Votes
Sensitivity
How sensitive is this microphone to capturing sound?
Very sensitive — Detects quiet sounds clearly
0Votes
0Votes
Sensitive — Captures a wide sound range
0Votes
0Votes
Moderate — Picks up normal voice levels well
0Votes
0Votes
Low — Needs to be close to sound source
0Votes
0Votes
Very low — Struggles to capture soft voices
0Votes
0Votes
Frequency Response Range
What do you think about the frequency response range of this microphone?
Wide range — 20 Hz to 20 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Good range — 30 Hz to 18 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Decent range — 40 Hz to 16 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Limited range — 50 Hz to 14 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Narrow range — Above 60 Hz only
0Votes
0Votes
Connectivity
How stable and reliable is the connection of this microphone?
Supermod 
Moderator 
Recaptor 
0 Cartling 
